The project's systems will have to evolve gradually by test and readjustment.
It would be inappropriate to attempt to map them out completely. It is
possible, nonetheless, to lay down elements of a stable framework.
11.1 Supporting Project Management and Control
Three key components of project management and control will be
- Direct and effective communications with country-level co-ordinators
- Maintaining information on influencers and decision-makers: Biographic
databases of key players
- Country-level activity and event tracking
11.1.1. Communicating with Co-ordinators
Maintaining excellent communications with country-level co-ordinators
is obviously vital. The overall goal should always be to try and ensure
that country-level co-ordinators, and as many project participants at country-level
are connected to reliable e-mail, and know how to use it. But this is unlikely
to be fully possible within first two years. In the meantime, a basic aim
should be to connect ADPC to an information co-ordinator in each country,
and to ensure that at least those staff involved in any GIS activity are
connected.
We considered a range of options and alternatives for meeting the core
communications requirements. Each has various advantages and disadvantages.
Fax links are used now, and work reasonably well. International Fax
charges are expensive for operating partners, and these costs are likely
to discourage a considerable amount of routine and speculative communications.
Nonetheless, the relative simplicity and reliability of fax makes it essential
as a core communications tool.
An alternative is to rely on institutional (university and company)
email links. At present the main problem with this approach is that several
institutions or departments involved in the project only have one email
box, and messages can take a considerable time to be routed internally.
In addition, those institutions providing individual mailbox accounts sometimes
impose a limit on the amount of material that can be held at any time.
The overall limits to this approach need testing empirically.
Another alternative is to rely on local Internet service providers,
and encourage each key participant to obtain access to a personal private
mailbox. Internet service providers charge in the region of $25 per month,
to which should be added an initial subscription (around $50) plus phone
bills. Users require at least 14k modems - $90 each - and if possible a
faster modem costing around $200. Email software and browser software is
relatively straightforward to install, but users may need two or three
hours of technical support and training to become fully operational. In
addition, most private email services are currently very overloaded, and
access is not guaranteed.
A higher cost solution is to encourage the use of an international Internet
provider such as IBM. Mailbox costs are about double the local service
providers, but transmission rates are generally higher, and accessibility
and service reliability is greater.
An additional option is to use FIDO or other amateur bulletin boards.
The FIDO system is unfortunately very slow, and is not really suitable
for large file transfers - a service which is highly desirable. In addition,
setting up FIDO access requires considerably more computer expertise than
a basic dial-up Internet account. FIDO may be an option in Laos, but is
not likely to be a good option elsewhere. There are two other possibilities.
One is to make a specific agreement for low cost or free donation of services
with a Value Added Network, or other provider, such as SITA, or IBM. The
second is to establish Internet servers in each country, with purchased
links to the international networks. Both are feasible, but would divert
much of the attention of the project administration from the basic practical
tasks of the project. These options are best considered only if other simpler
approaches are proving to be a major constraint.
Recommendations
The project should continue to rely on fax and telephone communications
for the most important discussions. At the same time, project members should
be encouraged to seek out dial-up access to local email service providers
where individuals don't have their own institutional email boxes and adequate
bandwidth.
Ensuring compatibility of software is important. Installation of viewers
such as the MS Word 6 viewer or QuickViewPlus on PCs for reading multiple
formats should be encouraged. In addition putting Acrobat reader software
and Visioneer Paper Port plug-in software on appropriately configured machines
would enable project participants to access scanned documents sent by the
AUDMP information section.
AUDMP should consider obtaining an account with the IBM Network for
travelling ADPC staff until regional roaming agreements involving the major
local Internet service providers are fully established.
A list of all project email numbers should be circulated to all project
participants, and the database of user addresses and contact details should
be available in a common transfer format.
11.1.2 Maintaining biographical databases, and Country Level activity
and event tracking
Keeping track of key decision-makers and other people involved at the
local level is vital to the project. By itself, this is a relatively simple
requirement. However, when linked with event tracking (see below) the issues
becomes harder to deal with. At present AUDMP uses a contact manager NOW
Contact. This is well-chosen in itself, and is adequate for day to day
requirements. It records names, contact details, and notes on each discussion,
and provides simple file links to other correspondence held on the network.
However, a new requirement develops as soon as there is a need for AUDMP
staff to keep track of promotional activity and other contacts made at
the national level. Furthermore, avoidance of overlap and confusion at
the national level requires a co-ordinated effort involving national project
level staff to share and communicate information on the contacts they routinely
make with city officials and others during the course of their work.
This is a similar problem to that faced by any fast evolving international
marketing company or indeed any large organization with a public role.
A number of networked database packages, commonly based on Lotus Notes
software have been developed for this kind of internal management of meetings
and workflow. However, these are very expensive, and require very substantial
system administration to keep operational. Even if available, these would
be difficult to apply in the relatively loose, and lightly networked environment
in which AUDMP operates.
At this level, keeping track of activity is more of a people issue than
a technical one. The more people see the collection and use of relevant
information as part of their jobs, the more readily available the information
will be and the more it will be used.
If the system as a whole does not share information, no technology will
help. However, once a reporting process is in place, there will be benefits
in collecting and storing the information that is available in such a way
that it can be made available efficiently, and that it is kept secure when
required.
This problem needs more work. At present it seems that the real need
is to spread the responsibility for collection and analysis of information
across the AUDMP project as a whole, to encourage email or fax reports,
and to store reports in a form which can be searched as free text, and
which can be replicated amongst key co-ordinators.
Both the purchase and development costs of Lotus Notes look too high
at this point for AUDMP. But simple textual databases or document indexing
programs such as Idealist for Macintosh, or Marco Polo, have search and
sort capabilities which make them useful for marshalling snippets of data.
At this point the best strategy may be to encourage a weekly in-confidence
"mitigation opportunities" report from project co-ordinators
in-country, and from any other participants who can be persuaded to participate.
Information requested could include:
- Who makes particular types of decision
- Who needs persuading
- What might work
- What factors to take into account
These should be digitized and indexed using the Marco Polo package.
As a relatively inexpensive experimental alternative Blackwell Idealist
might be considered as a database of choice for handling other snippets
of incoming project intelligence. If neither of these approaches work,
then it may be necessary to develop a database internally, to meet the
particular requirements of the project.
Actions now
Purchase Marco Polo (Mainstay Software) (High Priority)
11.2 Supporting establishment of networks, and of project identity
and cohesion
The main requirements here are to give the project an identity, make
people want to belong, and provide a rich milieu for communications and
ideas exchange. Coalition building is a central strategy, finding ways
in each country to link organizations from the public, private, and NGOs
sectors to build advocacy groups for disaster mitigation. The project will
also aim to build networks across national boundaries through such venues
as conferences and city twinning relationships.
As the project develops, a range of task related communications and
exchanges will need to be encouraged and facilitated, including idea generation,
technical information exchange, problem solving, dissemination of background
information, etc. This may be national or international.
These activities depend on the relative ease and low cost of communications,
and on the way the social process of networking is managed. There is much
focus presently on electronic means of networking, but it should be remembered
that there are many examples of successful postal mail networks.
The main information system elements are:
- A Membership directory
- Discussion moderators
- Some kind of shared forum, or shared conceptual "message board"
for joint communications
- A database of message archives, papers, and Frequently Asked Questions
(FAQs), accessible by email, WWW, or postal request.
- A Database of other useful contacts
There are several alternatives ways of approaching this networking requirement,
ranging from simple postal conferences to relatively sophisticated visual
conferencing systems.
Postal conferences can be very effective when based on circulating papers
and comments. The marginal cost of a mailing can be relatively low when
it is combined with other routinely circulated material. The administrative
load is somewhat higher than electronic methods, but material on paper
may still be read and stored more effectively than electronic documents
at this current early stage in the technology.
Internet email is the fastest and potentially the least expensive conferencing
method per transaction; however, as we have noted already, not many of
the project participants presently have access to the Internet.
Where full Internet access is available, WWW conferencing can be relatively
easy to follow, but even fewer have access, and it requires more modern
computing equipment. Also, a WWW page (password protected if necessary,
to give reasonable security) is increasingly being seen as an effective
way of archiving material for widespread ready access, either in association
with a conference or on its own.
Bulletin boards can be useful for archiving materials, but are much
too expensive for international conferencing. They are hard to maintain
unless a specific institution is willing to take on the job of system maintenance.
They still require modems and communications software to access, and most
people will only call one in the local call area. Modern bulletin board
software is visually attractive, and easy to use, and very inexpensive,
but unfortunately most people now prefer direct Internet access. A bulletin
board system should certainly be considered for a relatively sophisticated
and integrated technical group in a local area, but would have to be maintained
by that group. Probably the simplest and most capable bulletin board software
for non-specialist use is Wildcat 4, which runs on most DOS machines, or
Wildcat5 which emulates many Internet features on Windows equipment.
Videoconferencing can be feasible if built upon existing projects and
linkages. Options include bilateral regional experiments such as the A3
project involving AIT, the Institute of Technology - Bandung and a number
of other Asian universities. The use of CuSeeMee (an inexpensive Cornell
University Package for limited, small-window video links) may be worth
some experimentation, but the bandwidth to support video links of adequate
quality is unlikely to be in place in most developed urban areas of S.E.
Asia until around early 1998. This area should be explored in detail in
about nine months time.
The possibility of using hybrid arrangements is worth exploring - for
example, emailing material to a distribution point in each country, and
then printing, faxing, or posting the contents onwards within the country
itself.
Whatever the method chosen, it is important to have a framework for
networking: a series of products and "institutions". These need
to include:
- Briefings and instructions on how to participate
- Regular papers
- Reading lists
- Access to Specialised archives
- Collections of Frequently asked Questions (FAQs) and Frequently Encountered
Problems (FEPs)
- A database of specialists to whom specific questions and referrals
can be put.
Achieving a "critical mass" of users is essential for productive
networks. Even one or two defections may cause problems for meeting scheduling,
decision support, or project management applications. Even in an idealized
situation in which every individual will benefit once critical mass is
achieved, the early adopters may well abandon it before the critical mass
of users is reached. Encouraging project participants to believe that participation
in networking is a major element of performance review, and related to
future funding, may increase participation rates.
A number of priority actions are required now for network building.
First, potential sub-network facilitators in each country, and regionally,
need to be identified. The shape and character of different sub-networks
are likely to emerge during the next stage of the project, but are likely
to broadly include promotion strategies, integrated risk and vulnerability
mapping and analysis, and structural aspects of building design.
If the list is intended to operate mainly by email, management arrangements
for managing email forwarding of each message will be required. At present
this can easily be done manually with a single mailbox at ADPC. However,
if the list is made public, a fully functional listserv arrangement will
be needed. If possible, AIT's computer centre should be encouraged to provide
and support a Listserv for the project. If not, EPIX should be approached.
AUDMP's WWW pages will need to include material that facilitates the
work of each network sub-group. What is included should be decided by the
group. Whatever is included should be available on disk to other users
without WWW linkage, on request. The network sections of the page should
be password protected primarily to encourage relatively frank discussion
rather than to protect confidential material, and this should be made clear
to participants.
11.3 Information support for project credibility and visibility
There is a vital public relations task to ensure that the project's
overall credibility is kept high and that those who need to hear about
it have heard about it. Information related activities contributing to
this include:
- Developing basic displays and poster sets which can be used at conferences
and other public events (High Priority)
- Maintaining a simple database of Public Relations actions taken: who
made contact, who was contacted, and who was given what (High Priority)
- Production of materials which news media organizations can use off-the-shelf
in stories, for example maps, diagrams, etc. which can be taken up and
used directly (Medium Priority)
- Developing outlines of media articles which might be used to promote
stories about the project. (Lower Priority now)
11.4 Supporting Focused Promotional Activity
Focused promotional activity, aimed at city governments, opinion leaders
or business leaders, requires detailed information from as many sources
as possible on the influence and power of each group involved. Ideally
there should be some attempt to judge the weight of opinion on mitigation
issues, and the attitudes to various measures being proposed.
Those at country-level involved in promotional activity will need to
be supported with a combination of services, including:
- Packaged presentations - brochures, video, leave-behind material
- Self-run presentations: video or CD-Rom
- Packaged Displays for conferences
- Video material
- Radio scripts
This implies that AUDMP should develop a capacity either to produce
or to commission brochure development, multimedia authoring, computer to
video transfer for slide presentation development, and CD-Rom production.
Some in-house capacity to produce basic promotional materials is desirable,
if only to build up skills to manage outsourcing. The same resources would
also be applicable to developing training materials.
AUDMP already has excellent resources for developing promotional materials.
The main additional requirements are likely to be software for multimedia
productions, and some capacity to produce small runs of CDROMs in-house.
Currently, the most widely recommended package for multimedia development
is Macromedia Director. This is a complex package, which requires about
two months use to become proficient. Serious consideration should be given
to the choice of who would use it, and exactly what products should be
developed first. Strategically, in-house or outsourced skills in this area
will be important to ADPC as a whole, and the decision on this should be
linked to ADPC's overall needs for materials development for training courses
and distance learning.
CDROM Writer equipment is changing monthly, in price and capability.
There is no urgent need for purchase of the necessary hardware and software
until a clear demand emerges.
The highest priority product in this area is a good, simple brochure
as a focus for interviews, and a collection of output material from other
projects, especially the Quito project. A slide presentation transferred
to video, with a good commentary is a medium priority requirement at present,
but will increase in importance as the project proceeds. It may be best
to develop a video after the project has been underway for some months.
11.5 Supporting Scientific and Technical Analysis
The scientific and technical members of the project in each country
could benefit from a range of services:
- Mailings of routine current awareness bulletins in key technical fields,
advising of key publications and useful new information sources
- Easy access to relevant bibliographic databases and library catalogues
- Easy access to peer support
- Improved access to external expert support
- Ordering and document supply arrangements
- A training resources directory
- An information "marriage bureau" which helps to match people
interested in the same topic or subject
The approach to the technical group as a whole has to be tailored to
make use of limited resources, and also to avoid duplication by acting
as a information exchange on similar activities elsewhere, in particular
at specialist information centres such as the U.S. National Center for
Earthquake Engineering Research (NCEER) and the Natural Hazards Center
at Boulder, Colorado.
In terms of who provides the bulk of technical information support,
there are three basic options/alternatives:
- AUDMP takes on the prime responsibility for managing the circulation
of technical material (relying on AIT's technical library services for
specific advice and inputs where appropriate)
- An information broker is designated for the project in each city, using
whatever technical resources are available locally
- A hybrid arrangement is established, whereby AUDMP works together with
a local information service.
The best arrangement, provided communications will support it, is a
hybrid one with a local information specialist acting as an intermediary
and interpreter for a local community of technicians. In general, though,
AUDMP is likely to have to circulate a reasonable amount of technical material,
both to meet the demands of the technical members of the group as a whole,
and (notwithstanding the very high quality of several of the institutions
involved in the project) to ensure that an excellent standard of information
provision is sustained for the project as a whole.
Detailed current awareness requirements of individual researchers and
technical staff can be met in several ways, either in house, or relying
on other more specialist centres, or using custom services from commercial
information services. Although AUDMP's information staff could cover new
publications and research in a number of fields in detail themselves, it
seems far more efficient to use the services of other specialist centres
wherever possible. For example, since the NCEER produces a bimonthly detailed
information bulletin on new seismic engineering research (and a range of
other earthquake protection subjects), this should be circulated by AUDMP
to all technical staff on the project concerned with earthquakes. Similarly,
bulletins produced by flood hazard research centres in the UK and US cover
much of the flood hazard current awareness requirement. Alternatively,
custom current awareness services can be purchased from commercial groups
such as the Institute for Scientific Information, and this may be worth
exploring further when individual needs are better known. So far, it appears
that most requirements can be met from the output of existing research
and information centres.
Acquiring reports and papers should wherever possible be the responsibility
of individual technical staff in each country. However, it will probably
become clear that individual specialists may have local difficulties obtaining
material quickly or easily. In those cases AUDMP may be in a position to
obtain important reports or papers or other materials and circulate them,
either as originals, as photocopies, or by scanning and digitizing and
transmitting on disk, CDROM, or by electronic mail. In each case it will
of course be essential to follow the copyright laws of the countries involved.
Clearly there are also advantages in making material that one group
has requested potentially available to all project members involved in
similar activity. As the project develops, it should be possible to build
an archive of technical material from all projects upon which all members
can draw.
There are several ways of approaching this possible requirement. First
is to circulate lists of material held by each group, and to provide, and
encourage other groups to provide, photocopies by post on request. This
is worth trying initially in any case; it may work perfectly satisfactorily.
A second option is to formally copy material from country to country
and attempt to build up in-country libraries containing material from all
the projects. This seems excessive at this stage. Much material would probably
go unread. More limited shared collections would almost certainly be worthwhile,
however.
A third option is to use scanning software such as Acrobat Capture,
and to provide disk copies on local PCs of scanned material from each project,
for example using the inexpensive and simple 100 Mb Iomega Zip drives as
a transfer format. This is worth exploring initially on a small scale.
A fourth archiving option is for AUDMP to develop CDROMs containing
scanned material from all projects, circulating updates periodically. This
is well worth considering as the project develops, and as the technology
becomes simpler and cheaper.
Choice of document imaging software/transfer standards appears at present
to be fairly straightforward. The main choices for scanned material are
between Acrobat Capture, and other less widely used specialist document
imaging systems such as Watermark. Brief sources of details of other systems
are included in the Annexes. Since the Acrobat PDF file standard is becoming
widely used on the World Wide Web, and since reader software is freely
available, it seems worth experimenting first with Capture before considering
other much more expensive options.
11.5.1 Information Products for Technical Staff
The project should aim to produce the following regular information
products for technical staff: Monthly current awareness circular (include
proposals from country groups for contents) (High Priority)
- Items newly received at ADPC
- Other Reports/Books/Media of potential high interest
- WWW/Electronic publications of interest
- NHO (when available)
- Paper Copies of Disaster Research Newsletter
- Paper Copies of NCEER news (WWW site reference)
- Photocopies of contents sheets of a selected set of key journals
- Report on month's project activity
- Project meeting reports
- A regularly updated set of Group Frequently Asked Questions, and Frequently
Encountered Problems (High priority)
- A set of Technical Topic Briefings and Reviews (Medium Priority)
- A basic list of WWW sites relevant to the project (and an AUDMP routine
for regular checking of these sites). (Low Priority at present)
A range of actions are required now to establish an effective service
for technical project staff:
Catalogue the AUDMP collection using the Reference Manager package (High
Priority)
Produce "launch support packs" for each project (High Priority)
Photocopy and distribute title pages and contents sheets of a small
number of key reports and documents held in AUDMP which it would be possible
to duplicate or obtain for co-ordinators.
Finish a basic reading list on urban mitigation (Medium Priority)
Circulate title page and contents pages of key documents for comments
on the value of scanning or copying (Medium Priority)
Begin a basic current awareness programme immediately (High Priority)
Regular downloads of Natural Hazards Observer, Disaster Research, and
NCEER News
Library check routine
Websites routine checks
Current awareness requirements description form
Purchase a copy of the NCEER CDROM containing three major bibliographic
collections (Medium Priority)
Purchase a copy of PAHO's CDROM with the main Bibliodes bibliography. (Low
Priority at present - higher later)
Establish a basic catalogue of the journals available at ADPC and AIT,
a listing of relevant articles in ADPC library and AUDMP, and a regular
update on relevant new articles received.
Mail copies on request (Medium Priority)
Expand AUDMPs core bibliography. Build up a more comprehensive database
on lifeline disruption and technological breakdowns (Medium Priority)
Determine the demand for specific products (Medium Priority):
Review the demand and requirements for a product: Urban Mitigation Strategy
Briefings
Review the demand and requirements for photocopied contents lists of
key journals from a wider list of material held by AIT main library
Review the need for procedures to provide on request a limited number
of article copies from a specified list of journals (in AIT main library)
- approximately ten articles per requester per year
Review the need for procedures to provide copies of WWW papers on request
Review the need for procedures to provide searches of NCEER CDROM database
on request
Review the need for procedures to provide a limited number searches
of OCLC and NTIS databases at the request of country project co-ordinators
Establish a set of goals for country visits by AUDMP information staff
(High Priority)
Identify partners' capable of providing information support locally,
including:
Committed individuals
Institutional support
Technical support such as server management (SOPAC model)
Review partners' existing access to communications network services,
information sources, and communications needs
Review partner's Internet access options and provide support and assistance
where necessary
Advice on system set-up
Seek out expertise in setting up local intranets
Encourage country project co-ordination staff to get comprehensive access
to computers and email - training if necessary
Present brief seminars on ADPC information resources and services
Actions later (Spring 1997)
Begin to scan all the non-copyright and permission-obtained documents
on the basic list using Acrobat Capture (Medium Priority)
Build up a library on disk of key articles
Review the specific copyright agreements required
Develop routine for responding to and processing a larger volume of
email and fax requests (High Priority)
Ensure that at minimum that relevant articles referenced in Natural
Hazards Observer (NHO) and NCEER are ordered. To save time, ensure that
the electronic version of NHO is checked (Medium Priority)
Work out a way to archive Disaster Research and other Internet-based
electronic newsletters (Medium Priority)
Prepare a replicable seminar for project participants on mitigation
information resources (Medium Priority)
Establish remote access to ADPC databases (Lower Priority)
Test of First Search: test the document delivery services offered by
the First Search subscription held by AIT library (Lower Priority)
11.6 Supporting urban dataset management
Some of the technical staff of the project will need to access a wide
range of structured data, mostly in numerical form. This is particularly
the case with GIS specialists, but also includes other groups such as structural
engineers, and seismologists. Much of the data required will need to be
extracted from datasets held by a variety of organizations: urban survey
and land-use projects, public utilities, university geophysics departments,
etc. A quote by Susan Cutter at a recent meeting of mitigation specialists
in Boulder highlights the issue well in relation to US analysts' problems
with locational parameters, access, format, and data coverage and quality:
"Actual location: Flood plain locations and fault lines are educated
guesses, storm data are given by county rather than latitude and longitude,
for example. Access: Data are located in disparate sources. There are differences
between data compiled within various federal agencies and, sometimes, within
the same agency. The same is true regarding state databases. Efforts are
needed to unify data standards, compilation, and archiving. There is little
integration between hazard/disaster databases and environmental databases.
Confidentiality also interferes with data accessibility."
"Format: When data do exist, they may not be in a usable format.
For example, demographic databases are often based on political boundaries.
Databases are also static: the most recent census data is for 1990; what
about the population in 1996? Further, the census data is limited to where
people live, and does not cover where they work."
"Absent (missing, inaccurate, or highly uncertain) data: Examples
of absent data include data on hazardous material transportation and flow,
the value of land parcels, mitigation data (cost of mitigation, mitigation
actions, insurance), and local knowledge in our maps that incorporates
rapid development (which has an impact on risk assessment). "
AUDMP will probably need to play close attention to sources of expert
advice and assistance for individual national technical staff in relating
different data sets. If only to help with identification of sources of
assistance, it could also be useful if AUDMP itself developed some additional
familiarity with the somewhat arcane and technical issues of metadata cataloguing.
11.7 Supporting Urban Level Mitigation Strategy Planning
An important role in co-ordination and bringing mitigation into the
mainstream of city planning is likely to be played by city level hazard
safety advisory boards. There will generally include both technical staff,
urban planners, and utility specialists, as well as political representatives.
It will be important to ensure that members are fully briefed on available
methodologies, and that meetings of these groups are properly resourced.
Support could include GIS and mapping, small scale simulation, and collections
of case study material (for example, the Quito project, British Council
Mexico study, Stanford Palo Alto study, Fiji Suva Project, and a range
of US mitigation projects involving GIS)
Two actions needed at some stage for almost any hazard safety board
would be a collection and distribution of lists of Frequently Encountered
Problems (FEPs) from previous similar urban mitigation activities, and
the identification of members of GIS user groups in each country who may
be able to provide briefings and introductions to the use of GIS for members
with little prior experience of this technology and its benefits. This
activity should have high priority.
11.8 Helping With Replication/Diffusion Of Project Activities
The AUDMP project has great potential for replication and diffusion.
Much of this will occur very effectively within each country, as staff
from one city learn informally from others.
Replication will be enhanced by a solid framework of products: a comprehensive
series of clearly delineated reports and studies documenting each project
(see above); a collection of lessons learned in the course of implementation;
and free availability of as much as possible of the informal discussion
material produced by the various teams during the project. The latter would
include transcripts of meetings and seminars, memos, notes, and original
first drafts.
By the end of the project the range of options for archiving this material
will be wider than at present, but will almost certainly include high density
CDROM archives and WWW page. At this stage, the key requirement is to ensure
that material used at the inception of each project, expressing the uncertainties,
questions, and assumptions is preserved as far as possible.
11.9 Establishing A Future-Proof Model
From the review of possible technical innovations at the start of this
analysis, it should be clear that the AUDMP project will need to take account
of substantial changes in the way information is communicated, stored,
and processed over the life of the project. Quite sudden improvements are
likely to bring with them equally sudden new opportunities.
AUDMP staff will need to keep a "watching brief" on the emergence
of new software, and information management tools which could significantly
impact on the project. Some potentially important areas to keep in touch
with include intranet applications in city governments, GIS applications
in insurance and other industries, use of remote sensing data in hazard
assessment, Internet conferencing software, and the emergence of simpler
multimedia development tools for use in training and briefing.
Probably the simplest way of ensuring that information can be transferred
and maintained effectively in countries which are lagging technologically
is to encourage project staff with relatively modern computers (486 and
above for PC's) to install their own CDROM readers. costs will continue
to decline to below $40 per unit, and in any case CDROMs will become widely
available as existing computer assets are added to or replaced. This should
enable AUDMP to extract documents from the growing body of material held
on WWW servers, and also to distribute scanned material where this is appropriate.
A second set of developments to encourage at a later stage is the installation
of local dial-up intranets for project groups. This is unlikely to be an
issue for at least a year, but the opportunities of using what will soon
be a straightforward technology to focus disparate groups on a common agenda
may be just too positive to miss. The best place to start testing intranet
applications is with ADPC's own network.